Skip to content
Solvex Space
Governance / ComplianceFrom $1,499 · quoted to scopeAdvisory engagement

Board-Level Cyber Risk Reporting

Boards don't need packet captures — they need to know what could hurt the business, what's being done, and whether it's working. We build a board-grade cyber reporting pack and cadence: honest metrics, clear trends, and answers to the questions directors are now legally expected to ask.

Request a quote

Verified Solvex Specialist

Verified by Solvex

Direct specialist contact for Solvex engagements

What this means. An authorized Solvex administrator registered and approved this exact public identity. What it does not. Solvex has not inspected the account on the platform, and this is not the platform's own verification.

Solvex specialists never ask for your passwords, recovery phrases, one-time codes, or payments to a personal account. Work, scope and invoices are agreed in writing through the official channels on this site.

What's covered

  • Assessment of your current security reporting against board and regulator expectations
  • Design of a board-level metrics framework: risk posture, trends, incidents, program maturity
  • Translation of technical findings into business-impact language
  • Reporting pack templates aligned to your board calendar
  • Preparation support ahead of board and audit-committee sessions
  • Guidance on director-level cyber governance duties and disclosure expectations

What you receive

  • A reusable board reporting pack template tailored to your organisation
  • A defined metrics set with data sources and honest measurement notes
  • First-cycle reporting pack built with you, ready to present
  • Briefing notes for the executive presenting to the board
  • A quarterly refresh cadence your team can run independently

Evidence and reporting

How the work is kept honest
  • Evidence, frozen at issuanceFindings tie to something observed. When the report is issued, the evidence behind it is frozen in the same transaction and cannot be edited afterwards.
  • A signed reportAn Ed25519 signature covers both the report content and the delivered file. Alter a byte of either and verification fails.
  • Written scope firstAdvisory work runs to a written scope agreed before it starts, so what you receive is what was agreed.

Anyone holding a Solvex report can verify it publicly without seeing its contents.

Our boundaries

What this engagement does not do, stated before it starts.

  • Metrics reflect reality — we don't design dashboards that only ever show green
  • We advise on governance duties; we do not provide legal advice
  • Board presentation is by your executives — we prepare them, we don't replace them
  • Underlying security improvements are separate engagements

How this engagement runs

  1. 01

    Intake

    Tell us the system, the goal and the constraints. If the work is not a good fit, we say so before anyone is invoiced.

  2. 02

    Scope and authorization

    Written scope and signed authorization before anything is touched. Security testing runs only against systems you own or are contractually entitled to have tested.

  3. 03

    Investigation or build

    Specialists matched to the work. Findings are proven by hand — scanner output is a lead, never a finding.

  4. 04

    Evidence

    Every finding ties to something observed. When a report is issued, its evidence is frozen in the same transaction, so what backed the report cannot change afterwards.

  5. 05

    Delivery

    A signed report: an Ed25519 signature over both the content and the file, with a short verification reference you can read down a phone.

  6. 06

    Verification and retest

    Anyone holding the report can verify it publicly without seeing its contents. Fixes are retested as part of the engagement — “fixed” means we confirmed it.

Questions we are asked

What should a board actually see about cyber risk?
Four things, briefly: the top risks in business terms and their trend, the state of the security program against an agreed baseline, significant incidents and what changed because of them, and the decisions the board is being asked to make. Everything else is appendix material.
Our current reports are 40 slides of dashboards. Is that wrong?
Usually, yes. Volume is a substitute for clarity. Directors consistently report they can't tell what matters in dense technical packs — and regulators increasingly expect boards to demonstrate genuine oversight, which requires reporting they can actually interrogate.
Can you combine this with risk quantification?
Yes, and it's a natural pairing: our Cyber Risk Quantification engagement produces the financial exposure figures, and this engagement builds them into a reporting rhythm the board can track quarter over quarter.