Token Launch & Web3 Security Readiness
A pre-launch readiness review covering the things that go wrong on day one — admin privileges, upgradeability, oracle dependencies, deployment process and whether anyone is actually watching after the launch window closes.
Verified Solvex Specialist
Verified by SolvexDirect specialist contact for Solvex engagements
What this means. An authorized Solvex administrator registered and approved this exact public identity. What it does not. Solvex has not inspected the account on the platform, and this is not the platform's own verification.
Solvex specialists never ask for your passwords, recovery phrases, one-time codes, or payments to a personal account. Work, scope and invoices are agreed in writing through the official channels on this site.
Signed authorization required. This engagement is performed only against systems you own or are contractually authorized to have tested, under an agreed scope. See the responsible testing policy.
What's covered
- Token architecture and privileged-function review
- Ownership, multisig configuration and admin key custody
- Upgradeability pattern and the governance around using it
- Oracle and external dependency review
- Deployment process, verification and post-deploy checks
- Monitoring plan: what is watched, by whom, and what triggers action
- Incident plan: pause paths, communication and decision authority
- Dependency and supply-chain review of the contract toolchain
What you receive
- Launch readiness assessment with a go / no-go summary
- Privileged-function and admin-key inventory
- Deployment runbook review with concrete corrections
- Monitoring and alerting plan
- Incident response plan for the launch window
- Prioritised pre-launch remediation list
Evidence and reporting
How the work is kept honest- Evidence, frozen at issuanceFindings tie to something observed. When the report is issued, the evidence behind it is frozen in the same transaction and cannot be edited afterwards.
- A signed reportAn Ed25519 signature covers both the report content and the delivered file. Alter a byte of either and verification fails.
- Signed scope firstTesting starts only after written scope and signed authorization for systems you own or are entitled to have tested.
Anyone holding a Solvex report can verify it publicly without seeing its contents.
Our boundaries
What this engagement does not do, stated before it starts.
- This is a readiness review, not a full smart-contract audit — book that separately and before this
- No financial, investment, tokenomics or listing advice
- No representation that a token is safe to buy or hold
- Market behaviour and liquidity outcomes are entirely outside our scope
How this engagement runs
- 01
Intake
Tell us the system, the goal and the constraints. If the work is not a good fit, we say so before anyone is invoiced.
- 02
Scope and authorization
Written scope and signed authorization before anything is touched. Security testing runs only against systems you own or are contractually entitled to have tested.
- 03
Investigation or build
Specialists matched to the work. Findings are proven by hand — scanner output is a lead, never a finding.
- 04
Evidence
Every finding ties to something observed. When a report is issued, its evidence is frozen in the same transaction, so what backed the report cannot change afterwards.
- 05
Delivery
A signed report: an Ed25519 signature over both the content and the file, with a short verification reference you can read down a phone.
- 06
Verification and retest
Anyone holding the report can verify it publicly without seeing its contents. Fixes are retested as part of the engagement — “fixed” means we confirmed it.
Questions we are asked
- Is this the same as an audit?
- No. An audit examines the contract code line by line. This examines everything around it — who holds the admin keys, what the upgrade path allows, whether the deploy is reproducible, and who gets paged at 3am. Both matter, and the audit should come first.
- Can you tell us our token is safe?
- We can tell you what we reviewed, what we found and what we could not see. Nobody can certify a token as safe, and a provider offering that is selling reassurance rather than assurance.
- Should the admin keys be in a multisig?
- Almost always, and the harder question is the one people skip: who holds the signers, in what jurisdictions, and what happens if one is unreachable during an incident. A multisig that cannot reach quorum in an emergency is a liability wearing a safety label.
Related services
Web3 & Emerging
Smart Contract Security Audit
In Web3, code is money — and bugs are irreversible. Our auditors combine manual review with tooling to find the vulnerabilities that lead to drained funds and broken logic, before your contract goes live on-chain.
Web3 & Emerging
DeFi Protocol Security Audit
DeFi protocols combine complex contracts, economic incentives and composability — a rich attack surface. We audit the whole system, from contract code to economic design to oracle dependencies, so your protocol can hold value safely.
Web3 & Emerging
Web3 Incident Response & Recovery Advisory
Authorized defensive response to an on-chain incident: reconstructing what happened from public transaction data, containing further loss, preserving evidence and coordinating with exchanges and providers — without ever promising funds back.